|
Read this book and enjoy. This is an amazingly eye opening book for those who yearn to learn of the TRUE roots of American capitalism. Two prerequisites in order to enjoy this book: A) an open mind and B) an optimum outlook on change in society.
Do that for yourself. Unlike some other "classic" works, it deserves the designation, for it remains as timely today as it was at publication.Her observations are wise.
Her ideas stimulate intelligent and loving thought, conversation, and action. Her grasp of history is absolute.
This one changed mine. It's the seminal work of bell hooks career, which continues to enlighten and enrich all of us.
Read this book. I urge all young women of color to read this book while you are still in high school or college.
I urge all other humans to read it as soon as you can.
It is a testament to Hooks and other activists that this paradigm has been adopted by the general feminist movement.True women's liberation involves the liberation of all women from all artificially constructed notions about gender and ethnicity. Individuals with an open mind should love the pages of this now-classic work.I have always loved this book and it's practical insights on gender roles and a multifaceted approach to reproductive rights. Although Hooks is pro-choice, she reminds us that legalized abortion should be only one aspect of reproductive rights, and freedom from sterilzation abuse and full information on contraceptives is also important. Those who would dismiss Hook's scholarship and arguments as substandard are truly threatened by the radical observations she makes about the world and black women's relationship to it and in it. While we as a nation have historically seen the civil rights movement as primarily for black men, and the feminist movement as being for white women, we have silenced and subjugated the black feminist who has one foot in each of these communities and is going to weave together her own experiences. Hook's work is radical because it forces readers to deal with the less than favorable aspects of American history. The "Clif Notes" version Hooks has been maligned for by her critics have been practiced openly by white feminists (and predominantly white groups) so I honestly cannot see what the criticism is about unless it is the particular ideas themselves and not the way they are phrased. Confronting the real truth about America and the way it has historically treated and maligned women of color (and how they moblized against this) can be a challenging read, but only if the reader comes in with a defensive mind, prepared to discount the work anyway.
They do not like to see black women taking their cherished places as wives of powerful white men. If a lot of powerful white men were to marry black women and other women of color besides east asian and mexican women, white power will be gone for good. Privileged white women just want to preserve their privileges they obtain and keep other women from having them. Bell Hooks have done an excellent job on her book. For example, the Anita Hill case. I love this book.
They also blocked poor and working class white women(to a lesser extent, for they also have white skin privilege like their sisters)from realizing their potential. Which was the reason why American media didn't covered the royal wedding of the Prince of Liechtenstein and the black Panamanian woman. I think she had done an excellent job on dissecting the classist, racist, sexist structures that have kept black and mixed black women at the bottom of all the racial/class/gender hierarchy. It have brought far more changes in politics and, once again, white women have benefited more than black women(new 2001 Senate will have 13 women, all white).As for the antimiscegnation laws, I knew they were originally enacted to prevent white men to marry black women. I hope I look forward to see her publishing more of her works soon. She wrote a chapter about how privileged white women historically used their racial and class privileges to block black and other women of color(mexican, american indian,puerto rican) from access to wealth, power, influence, and especially, upward mobility.
White feminists tend to protect the status quo, mainly privileged white christian heterosexual men.
there a long list, and bell hooks does not hold up to them under any kind of scrutiny. bell hooks is wonderful at one thing: paraphrasing original thinkers, and that is simply inexcusable. Original feminist thinkers on race (many of who hooks shamelessly borrows from) are Toni Cade Bambara, Michelle Wallace, Hazel Carby, Toni Morrison, Angela Davis. The phenomenon that is bell hooks is both interesting and necessary. Her often true assertions are superficially considered and her clumsy prose resembles that of a beginning idealogue, not a careful and crafty writer/thinker. So why the single star. She has popularised political discussion, extending her hand outside of accademia in powerful ways. Because in evaluating a book like this, it is iimportant to evaluate the originality and rigor of a writer/scholar's work.
|
